Which of the following actions can be deemed ethical when a conflict arises?

When evaluating ethical actions in the face of a conflict of interest, withdrawing from representation when necessary aligns with professional responsibility standards. This choice acknowledges the fundamental duty attorneys have to act in the best interest of their clients while maintaining integrity and ethical standards.

In situations where a conflict arises, it may compromise the attorney's ability to represent their clients without bias or divided loyalty. By choosing to withdraw from representation, the attorney demonstrates a commitment to ethical practice, ensuring that the client's interests remain paramount. This aligns with the rules governing conflicts of interest, which emphasize the need for clear and unbiased representation.

The other options represent actions that could raise ethical concerns. Continuing representation without disclosure risks client trust and transparency, and could ultimately harm the client if the conflict negatively affects the representation. Relying on the client to resolve the conflict places an undue burden on the client and may lead to a misunderstanding of the ethical implications involved. Minimizing the importance of the conflict undermines the seriousness with which such ethical concerns should be treated, potentially resulting in inadequate representation or harm to the client. Thus, withdrawing from representation, when conflicts cannot be ethically managed, upholds the integrity of the legal profession.