When is it appropriate to reject a representation?

Rejecting a representation is appropriate when it violates a law or ethical duty. Lawyers are bound by professional rules that prohibit them from engaging in activities that contravene the law or their ethical obligations. Taking on a representation that involves illegal activities or professional misconduct not only jeopardizes the lawyer's career and reputation but also undermines their duty to uphold the law and serve the interests of justice. For example, if a potential client's case involves fraud or requires the lawyer to act unethically, rejecting that representation is necessary to comply with legal and ethical standards.

In contrast, while factors such as a low fee or the complexity of a case may influence a lawyer's decision to take on or continue with a client, they do not inherently constitute a legal or ethical violation. Similarly, a client's uncooperative behavior might complicate the attorney-client relationship but does not by itself justify the rejection of the representation if the case otherwise aligns with legal and ethical standards. Thus, the most clear and unequivocal reason for a lawyer to reject a representation lies in the potential violation of laws or ethical duties.