What is considered trickery in the context of professional responsibility for lawyers?

Trickery in the context of professional responsibility for lawyers involves deceptive practices that undermine the integrity of the legal profession and the administration of justice. The correct answer identifies both referring to inadmissible material and asserting personal knowledge of facts as forms of trickery.

When a lawyer refers to inadmissible material in court, they are engaging in misleading conduct that can distort the truth-seeking process. This can mislead the court and detract from fair proceedings, as inadmissible evidence is excluded for legitimate reasons, such as its lack of reliability or relevance.

On the other hand, asserting personal knowledge of facts when a lawyer does not actually possess that knowledge is also deceptive. This can create a false impression about the reliability of the information being presented, potentially influencing the judge or jury inappropriately.

Both behaviors violate the ethical obligation of lawyers to act with honesty and integrity, thereby fitting the definition of trickery in professional responsibility. Understanding that both actions can mislead others and disrupt the fairness of legal processes is crucial in recognizing the standards required of legal professionals.