What is a special duty of prosecutors concerning evidence?

Gain expertise for the California Professional Responsibility Exam. Study with targeted questions and detailed explanations to master ethics and professionalism. Prepare efficiently for your exam!

Prosecutors have a special duty to disclose evidence that is favorable to the defense in a timely manner. This obligation arises from the constitutional requirement established in the landmark case Brady v. Maryland, which mandates that prosecutors share exculpatory evidence that could potentially influence the outcome of a trial.

The significance of this duty lies in ensuring a fair trial for the defendant, as withholding such evidence can lead to wrongful convictions. By providing this information promptly, prosecutors uphold the integrity of the judicial process and help prevent miscarriages of justice. This responsibility fosters transparency and reinforces the principle that the prosecution should seek justice rather than simply pursue a conviction.

In contrast, suppressing evidence beneficial to the defense would violate ethical standards and the prosecutor's role in the judicial system. Collecting evidence only after case approval is not a requirement of prosecutors; they are expected to gather relevant evidence as part of their investigative responsibilities. The notion of maintaining evidence silently until trial does not align with the prosecutor's obligations, as they must actively manage evidence and disclose what is required to ensure fairness in the legal process.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy