What aspect of representation can an attorney limit with client consent?

The correct choice is that an attorney can limit the scope of representation with client consent. This means that the attorney and the client can agree on the specific matters that the attorney will handle for the client. For instance, a client may only want legal representation for certain aspects of a case, such as negotiations in a settlement, while wishing to handle the court appearances themselves. This limitation must be clearly communicated and agreed upon to ensure that both parties understand the extent of the attorney's responsibilities.

Understanding the scope of representation is crucial for managing client expectations and ensuring that the attorney's role is fully aligned with the client's needs. By restricting the scope, attorneys are able to focus on specified areas which can lead to more efficient and effective representation. This kind of consent must be documented clearly—typically through a retainer agreement or an engagement letter—to avoid misunderstandings later on.

In contrast, aspects like the lawyer’s decision-making authority may not be entirely limited without broader implications for the attorney-client relationship. Choices regarding the fee structure and the timeline for case completion can be influenced or negotiated, but they do not have the same flexibility as limiting the scope of representation directly tied to the legal work being performed.