In which situation is it permissible for an attorney to accept a limited scope representation?

Accepting limited scope representation is permissible when the client fully understands the limitations involved in this arrangement. In these situations, the attorney must ensure that the client is fully informed about what the limited representation entails, including the specific tasks the attorney will undertake and what responsibilities will remain with the client. This informed consent is critical because clients need to make educated decisions about their legal representation and understand any potential risks, particularly as it relates to the scope and effectiveness of the services being offered.

Limited scope representation can be beneficial in various scenarios, such as when a client seeks assistance with specific aspects of a legal matter while managing other parts independently. It allows clients to access legal services while maintaining control over their case. The attorney's duty is to explain the implications of a limited scope engagement clearly, ensuring the client appreciates the limitations of the representation.

In contrast, the other options do not align with the principles governing limited scope representation. Accepting limited representation in all client matters, regardless of the case; making decisions based on the attorney's confidence in winning; or restricting such arrangements only when the attorney has no other clients would not fulfill the ethical requirements in guiding informed consent from the client.