If a client disputes a fee, what does the ABA encourage regarding arbitration?

The correct response highlights the encouragement by the ABA for mandatory arbitration if requested by the client when a fee dispute arises. This approach supports the idea that clients should have a pathway to resolve disputes efficiently and economically.

In the context of professional responsibility, the ABA endorses arbitration as a means to provide a fair resolution to conflicts over fees. When a client explicitly requests arbitration, it should be considered an appropriate and necessary step to ensure that the client’s interests are taken seriously and are addressed in a timely manner. Mandatory arbitration in this scenario empowers clients and can aid in maintaining trust in the attorney-client relationship, as procedures are in place to resolve disagreements without resorting to lengthy litigation.

The other choices do not align with the ABA's recommendations regarding fee disputes. For instance, suggesting that arbitration must occur in court contradicts the nature of arbitration, which is intended to be an alternative dispute resolution mechanism outside of the court system. Indicating that arbitration requires both parties to agree does not reflect the client's right to initiate this process when there is a dispute. Lastly, stating that arbitration is not permitted ignores the ABA's endorsement of this method as a beneficial and practical means of resolving disputes.